Kirsch in the fondue? Housewives getting drunk off spiked cheese? Correcting executor to executrix? Is executrix a real word? It is. A novel about divvying up assets with this much energy and madness in a sentence? I was sold. I intended to put the book back and check it out from the library, which was on the way home anyway. The guy who ran the book stand said something smart ass to me.
I nodded, put the book down, and flipped through another box until he turned his head. I slid the book into the pocket of my plaid bermudas and headed home. The next several hours were spent reading the book without a break.
It was sometime around 2 AM when I got to the end. This novel, like life itself, was too massive to wrap up tightly at the end. This is the first great thing about a Thomas Pynchon novel: it invites us to see life with more complexity. The world around us is chaos in the purest sense. If we get even a little philosophical, we see that we understand less than a tiny fraction of nature, life, meaning, language, societies, cultures, and ourselves.
Pynchon helps us with that. His novels lead us up to that giant sea of the unknown. They slide our shoes off and seduce us. Dip it. Luckily he was alone in there. Not jerking off. Thank god he did. I was so stoked by the book that he got inspired.
The next morning, he started in on The Crying of Lot He gave up after the first page. On the punk side, I wrote a column for the first ninety issues of this zine. Before that, I wrote for Flipside for five years.
The book is called Occupy Pynchon. Occupy Pynchon came out in May Pynchon for punk rockers is tough. They charge at you going one hundred MPH. You have to learn how to experience them, how to pick meaning out of the madness. In that sense, reading Pynchon is like listening to a hardcore record. Thomas Pynchon is no punk rocker. Thomas Pynchon was born in in New York.
His father was an upper middle-class guy, an industrial surveyor and, for one year, city supervisor of Oyster Bay, New York. Pynchon attended Cornell University for two years, joined the Navy, then returned to Cornell, where he graduated in His Ivy League connections helped him get his early work published.
In the seventies, Donadio reportedly scored Pynchon a million-dollar advance on a two-book deal. Sometime in the early eighties, Pynchon and Jackson married. Now, Jackson is a heavy-hitter in publishing, representing boring, painfully bourgeois authors like Rick Moody and Lorrie Moore.
Salinger or the Unibomber or whomever. The rumors can be fun, but they ignore the fact that a lot is known about the guy. He lives on the Upper West Side of Manhattan.
He did two guest appearances on The Simpsons. The books seem to be the most interesting thing about his life. It came out in , when Pynchon was twenty-five. It won the William Faulkner Foundation Award and was a huge critical and commercial success.
He bounces around from job to job and place to place, sleeping on couches, hanging out with a bunch of bohemians who call themselves the Whole Sick Crew, and delving into relationships with various women who want to save his lost and doughy ass.
From all I can gather, Profane was modeled after Pynchon himself. Pynchon also yo-yoed around New York and the northeast corridor, hanging out with old Navy and college buddies, one even named Pig Bodine like a character in V. The most entertaining parts of the Benny Profane sections of V. For instance, Profane spends a chapter hunting alligators in the sewers under Manhattan. While underground, he discovers a shrine for and subsequently reveals the history of a patron saint of sewer rats.
If the novel alone were just about a dude in his early twenties wandering around lost and getting drunk with his buddies, it would probably be long out of print and forgotten. What makes V. His search for V.
What Stencil can reconstruct of her movements and her possible life allows readers to venture into the upper echelons of power and colonialism that led to the first World War.
Eventually, Profane and Stencil team up and plan to travel to Malta, where they try to solve the mystery of V. In my five or six readings of V. I first read V. I was living in Atlanta and wrapping up the first draft of my first novel, Drinks for the Little Guy.
I had the lost and drunk dude in his early twenties, a mostly autobiographical portrait. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. Thomas Pynchon is a writer famous for having dense and hard to read books, but is acclaimed for those books. He wrote V. What order should I read his books? His books are often read in specific orders, because all of them are hard to understand, and some books are easier than others.
What order should I read the books in to help them be easiest to understand? If you're tackling the first three books, I'd say Lot 49 , followed by V. There is a serious ramp-up in difficulty across those three books:. Similar level of length and difficulty to V. Might seem relevant if you follow American politics.
Good introduction to both the first and the second half of his career. As for whether a reader will "miss out" on critical information if they haven't read Book A before Book B, generally, no. There are a number of "soft" connections between the books, i.
A major exception to this -- a "hard" connection -- is the Suedwest Africa chapter of V. Due to V. Admittedly, this advice is contrary to what most people say on the subject - Kevin Troy's answer has the standard advice covered very nicely - but I'll give my answer nonetheless.
If it's not useful to you you'll be no worse off, but on the off chance it is, well, here you go:. My advice would be to start with Gravity's Rainbow. Because it's the one people talk about in hushed tones, the one people put off reading for fear they aren't up to the task. But it's just a book. It's a strange book, sure, but it's far from the impenetrable thing people make it out to be. It possibly seems that to people who take it too seriously, who think everything in it must be a reference to something else, and every scene and character is part of some larger whole beyond their comprehension.
Now, there are a lot of references to other things - sure - and deeper meanings to be found if you search for them - yeah, and some of it's pretty cool - but I also think Pynchon gets overanalysed. I suspect he's just having fun a lot of the time, and a lot of it isn't really supposed to make sense on any kind of complex level.
Leaving aside the question of "why" one should read Pynchon I'll defer to the Pynchon Wiki here: the reward from these texts is phenomenal and they will haunt the reader for years to come , where should the curious reader start with Pynchon? The traditional starting point, as partially echoed in the WikiHow article " How to read a Thomas Pynchon novel " and undergraduate courses worldwide, is to start with The Crying of Lot However, it by no means captures the awe-inspiring breadth of Gravity's Rainbow , which marks the highpoint in my mind of Pynchon's fiction.
Gravity's Rainbow , though, is sure to put off a good few people who might be tempted to plow through if they reap the rewards of Lot Mark Kohut suggests that Pynchon's latest novel, Inherent Vice , could be a valuable starting place for its comedic tone and focus upon the era in which Pynchon wrote Gravity's Rainbow.
This, again, is not unproblematic. This apparently self-conscious turn away from the odiously reductive label of metafiction towards the humanistic and more overtly political concerns of Pynchon's writing which were, nonetheless, certainly present in V. However, yet again I feel that recommending anything post- Vineland as a starting point for someone interested in reading Pynchon will deprive them of the grandeur of the early work and, certainly with Against the Day , convince them that vast passages of Pynchon are tedious and overwritten.
Note: I am a big fan of Against the Day , but it took me several readings to appreciate it and I would not expect a newcomer to devote such effort to an author of which they were unsure.
0コメント